A box of Redheads matches. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Did you know that only about 1-2% of the world’s population are natural redheads? What we don’t know is how many people ( I would imagine mostly women) dye their hair red. I’ve been thinking about how many people I know who are real redheads and out of all the people I know, it’s not very many. There’s my friend Marylou in CT who has always been a redhead and has the accompanying fair skin. Then there’s my cousin Christine who looks like a redhead to me but not too red. I was told that my father was a redhead when he was a baby and his grandfather was a notable redhead with a red handlebar mustache. For a couple of years my friend Susan was a redhead (from the bottle) and I once saw a photo of my friend Helen who had this gorgeous red mane! How many redheads do you know?
Today my cousin Barbara posted a link to article from Huff Post , a blog from the UK, and I thought what a neat idea it would be to use their list of facts about redheads as my Thursday’s Top Ten.
-
Natural red hair is harder to dye than other shades
Headstrong as it is, ginger hair holds its pigment much firmer than any other hair colour. If redheads desired to dye their hair to any other colour (why would you?), it would only have a noticeable difference after bleaching the hair beforehand. Otherwise, the colour won’t take.
- Redheads have less hair on their headsIn terms of total number of strands, gingers have far fewer atop their red heads than any other colour.
On average, flame-haired beauties have 90,000 strands, compared to blondes with 110,000, and brunettes with 140,000.
They’re not exactly going bald though, as each strand of natural ginger hair is much thicker, so the appearance is often that redheads have more hair in general.
- Redheads don’t go greyStaying true to its stubborn stereotype, ginger hair retains its natural pigment a lot longer than other shades.
So there’s no need to panic about going grey – red hair simply fades with age through a glorious spectrum of faded copper to rosy-blonde colours, then to silvery-white.
- Red hair and blue eyes is the rarest combination in the worldThe majority of natural redheads have brown eyes, with others likely to have hazel or green shades.
But like red hair, blue eye colour is a recessive trait, meaning that both parents must carry the gene for a child to be blessed with it. This makes those with red hair and blue eyes the rarest minority in the world, with only 1% having both.
So, each one is about as rare as a four-leaf clover.
- They’re more sensitive to thermal painCountless studies have looked into the genetics behind redheads claiming that they are more or less sensitive to pain.
Research shows that redheads are more sensitive to hot and cold pain, with their bodies able to change temperature much quicker.
Also, in surgery, gingers might require approximately 20% more anaesthesia than other hair colours. The exact reason for this is unknown, but it is thought that a link to the mutated MC1R gene could be the culprit to its effectiveness.
- The Romans kept redheaded slaves at a higher priceThose with fiery-coloured hair were held in high esteem in Roman art and culture. Thought to be strong and determined, they were more expensive than other slaves, and prisoners would even have their hair dyed to be displayed as trophies.
- Russia means ‘Land of Reds’Translating to mean ‘Land of Reds’, Russia boasts a high density of gingers located in its Kazan region, at over 10% redheads, a similar density to Scotland and Ireland.
- 40% of Brits are ‘Secret Gingers‘Extensive research conducted by BritainsDNA has found that more than 40% of the population carry the mutated MC1R gene that’s responsible for red hair.
Both parents must carry the gene to be able to spawn a ginger baby, which lies at 25% if they’re not ginger themselves, but still carry the ‘secret gene’.
- Adolf Hitler reportedly banned ginger marriages…For fear of ‘deviant offspring’. Of course.
- Gingers generate their own Vitamin DHaving pale skin may mean that redheads burn more easily when exposed to UV rays, but their paleness can serve as an advantage.
Redheads can’t absorb sufficient Vitamin D due to low concentrations of eumelanin in their body.
Related articles
Bill Ding and his band of clowns are the security patrol for this blog site. He is a favorite toy from the 50*s. By the way sometimes a blog is just an ego-maniacal stream of conscience.
Pbenjay's Blog 
“PHILOMENA” – A Journey of Faith and Forgiveness
Posted in From My Point of View - Personal commentary on Movies and Books, tagged Catholic Church, Daily Mail, Ireland, Judi Dench, Martin, Martin Sixsmith, Philomena, Steve Coogan, United States on January 13, 2014| Leave a Comment »
English: Magdalen Laundry in England, early 20th century. Scanned by Eloquence* from Finnegan, F.: Do Penance or Perish. A Study of Magdalen Asylums in Ireland. Congrave Press, Ireland, Piltown, Co. Kilkenny (2001). (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
With 12 Years A Slave and The Butler sounding the alarm and need for civil rights in America, there was another less-talked about atrocity taking place in Ireland. Across the sea in a convent in the town of Roscrea, Catholic nuns were running a babies-for-sale business.
If you were an unmarried and pregnant young girl in Ireland in the early 1950’s, you would surely be ostracized by your family and sent away to hide the shame you brought down on the family. The pregnancy was the result of a mortal sin, so it was only natural for the family to turn to the Church for guidance and counsel.
Philomena was sent away to the Roscrea Abbey to live and work until the baby was born. The girls were treated as sinners, as evidenced by the denial of any painkillers during a painful breech birth delivery. The girls signed away their rights to the baby and were indentured for years to repay the nuns for taking them in. It is the Magdalene laundries all over again. Childless Catholic American couples bought the babies and took them away to the United States. That’s the back story and the basis for Philomena’s 50 year search for her long lost son, Anthony.
The film is about that search. It was adapted from the book, The Lost Child of Philomena Lee written by Martin Sixsmith. Philomena hooks up with a fallen-from-grace journalist and together they set out to find Anthony who was renamed Michael and adopted by a Dr. Hess and his wife. It’s through Martin’s former Washington DC connections that facts are uncovered, names and whereabouts. The ensuing road trip is hysterical at times. Dame Judi Dench gives us an amazingly hilarious interpretive performance of woman whose mind is as Martin describes to his boss, “I’ve finally seen firsthand what a lifetime’s diet of Reader’s Digest, the Daily Mail and romantic fiction can do to a person’s brain.” Their odd couple odyssey has some of the movie’s best dialogue. As they travel across the big pond and back, Philomena’s unshakable faith and Martin’s (a fallen Catholic) disdain for religion clash. As Lee becomes more serene, more accepting of the situation and all the more forgiving, Martin boils with rage at the injustice, the hypocrisy, the lies and most of all the institutional piety.
To adapt the book to the big screen and to introduce to Michael, the film relied on home movie flashbacks, which was a very effective way to let the audience see Anthony (Michael) grow up, while keeping the focus on Philomena. There has been a decidedly different reaction to the movie. Some see it as another attack on the Catholic Church and others as a heart-wrenching love story of a mother.
I enjoyed the movie even though I had to endure the expected criticism of organized religion by my atheist husband. Being Catholic is not an advantage to viewing the movie, but there are moments that we appreciate all the more for being so.
Steve Coogan is truly wonderful as Martin Sixsmith. Mr. Coogan bought the rights to the book before he even read it and he co-wrote the screen play.
Related articles
Rate this:
Read Full Post »