Almost but not quite, everyone has a nickname. Babies get temporary nicknames like sweetie pie, bunny, cookie face, doll baby. As these little babies grow up their given names may also evolve into some shortened version albeit a nickname that is easily recognized as an abbreviated take on their actual name. For example just in my own and extended family, Janet became Janie, Ellen became Ellie, Chiara became KiKi, Lorraine became Lori and Alyson became Sonny.
And then there are some nicknames that have historical origins and our Thursday’s Top Ten List will explore some of them.
1. WHY IS DICK FROM RICHARD?
The name Richard is very old and was popular during the Middle Ages. In the 12th and 13th centuries everything was written by hand and Richard nicknames like Rich and Rick were common just to save time. Rhyming nicknames were also common and eventually Rick gave way to Dick and Hick, while Rich became Hitch. Dick, of course, is the only rhyming nickname that stuck over time. And boy did it stick. At one point in England, the name Dick was so popular that the phrase “every Tom, Dick, or Harry” was used to describe Everyman.
2. WHY IS BILL FROM WILLIAM?
There are many theories on why Bill became a nickname for William; the most obvious is that it was part of the Middle Ages trend of letter swapping. Much how Dick is a rhyming nickname for Rick, the same is true of Bill and Will. Because hard consonants are easier to pronounce than soft ones, some believe Will morphed into Bill for phonetic reasons. Interestingly, when William III ruled over in England in the late 17th century, his subjects mockingly referred to him as “King Billy.”
3. WHY IS HANK FROM HENRY?
The name Henry dates back to medieval England. (Curiously, at that time, Hank was a diminutive for John.) So how do we get Hank from Henry? Well, one theory says that Hendrick is the Dutch form of the English name Henry. Henk is the diminutive form of Hendrick, ergo, Hank from Henk. Hanks were hugely popular here in the States for many decades, though by the early 90s it no longer appeared in the top 1,000 names for baby boys. But Hank is making a comeback! In 2010, it cracked the top 1,000, settling at 806. By 2013 it was up to 626.
4. WHY IS JACK FROM JOHN?
The name Jack dates back to about 1,200 and was originally used as a generic name for peasants. Over time, Jack worked his way into words such as lumberjack and steeplejack. Even jackass, the commonly used term for a donkey, retains its generic essence in the word Jack. Of course, John was once used as a generic name for English commoners and peasants, (John Doe) which could be why Jack came became his nickname. But the more likely explanation is that Normans added -kin when they wanted to make a diminutive. And Jen was their way of saying John. So little John became Jenkin and time turned that into Jakin, which ultimately became Jack.
5. WHY IS CHUCK FROM CHARLES?
“Dear Chuck” was an English term of endearment and Shakespeare, in Macbeth, used the phrase to refer to Lady Macbeth. What’s this have to do with Charles? Not much, but it’s interesting. However, Charles in Middle English was Chukken and that’s probably where the nickname was born.
6. WHY IS PEGGY FROM MARGARET?
The name Margaret has a variety of different nicknames. Some are obvious, as in Meg, Mog and Maggie, while others are downright strange, like Daisy. But it’s the Mog/Meg we want to concentrate on here as those nicknames later morphed into the rhymed forms Pog(gy) and Peg(gy).

Edward “TED” Kennedy
7. WHY IS TED FROM EDWARD?
The name Ted is yet another result of the Old English tradition of letter swapping. Since there were a limited number of first names in the Middle Ages, letter swapping allowed people to differentiate between people with the same name. It was common to replace the first letter of a name that began with a vowel, as in Edward, with an easier to pronounce consonant, such as T. Of course, Ted was already a popular nickname for Theodore, which makes it one of the only nicknames derived from two different first names. Can you name the others?
8. WHY IS HARRY FROM HENRY?
Since Medieval times, Harry has been a consistently popular nickname for boys named Henry in England. Henry was also very popular among British monarchs, most of whom preferred to be called Harry by their subjects. This is a tradition that continues today as Prince Henry of Wales , as he was Christened, goes by Prince Harry. Of course, Harry is now used as a given name for boys. In 2006, it was the 593rd most popular name for boys in the United States. One reason for its upsurge in popularity is the huge success of those amazing Harry Potter books.
9. WHY IS JIM FROM JAMES?
There are no definitive theories on how Jim became the commonly used nickname for James, but the name dates back to at least the 1820s. For decades, Jims were pretty unpopular due to the “Jim Crow Law,” which was attributed to an early 19th century song and dance called “Jump Jim Crow,” performed by white actors in blackface. The name “Jim Crow” soon became associated with African Americans and by 1904, Jim Crow aimed to promote segregation in the South. Jim has since shed its racial past, and is once again a popular first name for boys all by itself, sans James.
10. WHY IS SALLY FROM SARAH?
Sally was primarily used as a nickname for Sarah in England and France. Like some English nicknames, Sally was derived by replacing the R in Sarah with an L. Same is true for Molly, a common nickname for Mary. Though Sally from the Peanuts never ages, the name itself does and has declined in popularity in recent years. Today, most girls prefer the original Hebrew name Sarah.
May 24, 2010 – 5:07am
Read Full Post »
TOP 10 Great Movies BUT BOX OFFICE FLOPS!!!
Posted in From My Point of View - Personal commentary on Movies and Books, Thursday's Top Ten, tagged box office failures, Elizabeth Taylor, flops, great movies, Jimmy Stewart, Johnny Depp, Judy Garland, Kevin Costner, Martin Scorcese, movies, Orson Welles, Robert DeNiro, Tim Robins, Toto on November 7, 2014| 3 Comments »
It’s so true…many movies we’ve come to love and make classic were really box office flops in their day! You’re going to be shocked by some of these, I’m sure.
Orson Welles in Citizen Kane
1. CITIZEN KANE: Most often listed as the Number 1 top movie on many lists and the must-see handbook for aspiring film-makers and actors, this movie didn’t do much for Orson Welles career at the time. Initial reviews were favorable but much of the American public was shielded from them because Randolph Hearst, the newspaper mogul, blocked any mention of the movie, believing the character was based on him.
2. IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE: There wouldn’t be a holiday season if there weren’t a broadcast of this now-loved classic Christmas story. It’s hard to imagine a film watched so often by so many could have failed miserably in the theaters, but it did. The movie cost $3.18M to make and only grossed $3.3M.
3. BLADE RUNNER: With an opening weekend revenue of only $6M, things looked dim for this movie that cost $28M to make. It received mixed reviews, while viewers were awed by the imagery, they were alienated by the narrative. It probably would have been better if the studio had left Ridley Scott alone and kept his original vision instead of meddling with the final cut. The film resurfaced with a Director’s Cut in 1992 prompting critical reevaluation and huge home video sales.
4. RAGING BULL: A favorite of mine as I am in still in awe of Robert DeNiro who totally transformed his body to play the thuggish Jake LaMotta. It was nominated for 8 Oscars but tanked at the box office. It lacked the feel-good factor of ROCKY and alienated the viewers first by being shot in black and white which was exactly how it should have been done artistically and then there was the prevalent violence for 2 hours – most people go to the movies to relax and enjoy some form of escapism.
5. THE WIZARD OF OZ: Can you believe this movie actually lost money? It cost $2.7M to make and garnered $3M in its opening run. Viewers did not flock to see Judy Garland, a cute dog and a tornado in technicolor. However, over the years and many re-releases, the viewing of The Wizard of Oz has become an annual event in many of America’s households.
Shawshank Redemption
6. SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION: Tell the truth now, do you switch the channel when you see Shawshank Redemption playing? The film finally found its audience on TV. In 1994 when it was released, it was overwhelmed by PULP FICTION AND FORREST GUMP. It cost $25M to make and grossed $28M.
7. THE ROCKY HORROR PICTURE SHOW:$ Budget-$1.4M. This one requires some explanation. Despite making next to nothing ($22,000) its opening weekend, the late night flick is actually the longest running movie in continuous theatrical release, attracting a cult of folks who dress up and shout along to the campy comedy with kick-ass songs. With ticket sales, and home movie availability, it has reportedly made over $365 million! Just like the movie itself, it’s financial success is in a category of its own.
8.THE FIGHT CLUB: Budgeted at $63M it grossed $37M. Maybe the first rule of Fight Club shouldn’t have been “Don’t talk about Fight Club.” David Fincher’s adaptation of the Chuck Palahniuk novel was the victim of a botched marketing campaign (or at least that’s what the studios are saying). It lived on through home video sales.
9. THE BIG LEBOWSKI: Happy to admit I’m part of the cult club that will watch The Big Lebowski whenever it is on TV. Not many box office bombs can claim such a cult following, an annual fan festival and religion! Released in 1998 during the immensely successful box office run of “Titanic,” the film starring Jeff Bridges, which cost $15 million to make, debuted to $5.5 million opening weekend. The film recieved mixed reviews with Variety calling it “hollow and without resonance” while others like Roger Ebert found it “weirdly engaging” like the Dude himself. The film eventually pulled in $17 million at theaters, but it wasn’t until years later fans used the internet and social media to re-evaluate the film and turn it into a cult sensation.
10. I’m leaving number 10 blank and giving you all some suggestions. What do you think was a great film but one didn’t make any money? Here are a few; The Fountain, Water World, Assination of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford, Ed Wood, Cleopatra, Heathers, Vertigo, Willie Wonka and The Chocolate Factory, The Postman, The Hudsucker Proxy, Tron-The Legacy, Donny Darko, Once Upon A Time In America
OK guys it’s your hands, let’ s vote for number 10 – one of the above or one of your own.
Rate this:
Read Full Post »