Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘From My Point of View – Personal commentary on Movies and Books’ Category

If you Twitter and follow the Trending Worldwide list you know that Inception has been on the list for more than a week!!! That in itself is pretty unusual, almost unheard of in this day of today you’re hot and tomorrow you’re yesterday’s news – however the unknown number of Tweets devoted to this science fiction fantasy designed to mind-fuck the viewer, has to be in  the thousands. That kind of statistic should be enough to blow your mind never mind having to watch a movie that you’re never sure you’re watching anyway.

Inception, Christopher Nolan, dream within a dream, Leonardo DiCaprio

The Dream is REAL

Maybe I didn’t see it after all – it could have been a manufactured dream by Christopher Nolan or was I just a projectionist in Leo’s mind.  Well if I didn’t see it, I hope I wake up soon-hey that was one of the best lines in the movie! “Wake me up, wake me up”!

A gazillion dollar mega-movie designed to capture the insipid and the imaginative summer movie goer’s mind.  Well the timing couldn’t have been better.  I ‘ll bet there were more people going to see this movie in the Northeast than anyplace else.  Perfect formula: heat and humidity hovering in the 90’s for weeks, summer mind set as you wait for a two week vacation or regret that it’s already come and gone, supply several movie houses all icily air-conditioned and playing Inception and whammo, you’ve got a full house every day.

Let me share with you what some of the professional reviewers are saying:

Inception,” is an astonishment, an engineering feat, and, finally, a folly. Nolan has devoted his extraordinary talents not to some weighty, epic theme or terrific comic idea but to a science-fiction thriller that exploits dreams as a vehicle for doubling and redoubling action sequences. He has been contemplating the movie for ten years, and as movie technology changed he must have realized that he could do more and more complex things. He wound up overcooking the idea. Nolan gives us dreams within dreams (people dream that they’re dreaming); he also stages action within different levels of dreaming—deep, deeper, and deepest, with matching physical movements played out at each level—all of it cut together with trombone-heavy music by Hans Zimmer, which pounds us into near-deafness, if not quite submission. Now and then, you may discover that the effort to keep up with the multilevel tumult kills your pleasure in the movie. “Inception” is a stunning-looking film that gets lost in fabulous intricacies, a movie devoted to its own workings and to little else. Read more http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/cinema/2010/07/26/100726crci_cinema_denby#ixzz0v5DYs7Fz


It is a fascinating visual feast, The Matrix with heart and soul, a roller coaster ride into layers of the subconscious mind that challenges our ability to keep up.

Lori Hoffman

Are they handing out joints at the box office for this?

Kurt Loder
By convoluting the various planes of experience, by overlapping and obscuring ostensible realities and ostensible dreams, Mr. Nolan deprives us the opportunity of investing emotionally in any of it.

John Anderson
So there you have just a minute cross-sampling of what some of the best known critics are saying about this movie.
IF you saw it and loved and want to be amongst the like-minded, I say go to Twitter and add your Tweet to the multitude of adoring fans taking advantage of a public but not discriminating forum,  where you too can add your two cents to to the swarming ant hill of comments – because in Twitter, your comments (and mine) are just as important as Christopher Nolan’s and Roger Ebert’s – well at least for a millisecond before “44 New Tweets have been added since your comment.”

Read Full Post »

Wellllll I went to see Sex and the City2 and it was 2 long, 2 dumb, 2 short on plot, 2 predictable, and 2 cartoonish.

If this site was Rotten Tomatoes I would give it 3 rotten tomatoes which by the way is pretty close to what the movie has gotten on that site.  As of tonight, Sex and the City2 has received 150 rotten tomatoes out of 179 reviews.   I knew that it had been getting bad reviews but I really did want to see it.  I DID enjoy the first movie and well I did hope that this one would be somewhat good. NOT!

It was too long, it dragged in places, the clothes that Carrie wore throughout the first part of the movie were ugly, Mario Cantone was totally wasted in the movie –  I don’t mean he was wasted, I mean his talent was wasted.  He had the most inane lines, what a disappointment!  The wedding scene was so over the top gay that it was a cartoon.

When the show was on, the characters almost seemed believable;  maybe because at that time, I had my daughter Chiara living with me and she and her entourage looked the part, dressed the part and partied the part!  BUT in the movie tonight I felt like I was watching a cast of reality show contestants; there was Carrie and Mr. Big as the hip New York childless couple,  Miranda as the smart control freak, more lawyer than lover and mother, Charlotte the obessive by the rules girl, feeling guilty because she thinks she’s supposed to feel guilty and of course Samantha the over-sexed  going over the hill 4th.  Samantha was probably the most caricatured character of them all.  The woman who loved to love men on the show was now portrayed as an aging, hormone junkie who sits at her desk with her panties around her ankles, rubbing cream into her V Jay Jay! There is nothing attractive about a crude mouthed menopausal nymphomaniac (nymphomania is a mental illness).

Now if the movie was supposed to be a spoof, a comical satirical view of not so young single women who mostly were not single anymore, then you could overlook the over the top portrayals – but it wasn’t that kind of movie.  It took itself much more seriously than that.  Carrie and Mr. Big reveled in their special two-ness, their just me and you-ness.

As far as a fashion statement, I thought the clothes worn by the girls when they were in Abu Dhabi were wild and interesting and for the most part flattering.  AND I guess we can expect to see that four leaf clover necklace on every pre-teenage girl in the coming months.

Sex and the City2, Carrie Bradshaw, new york city, sarah jessica parker

Carrie's Four Leaf Clover necklace

My advice – wait till it comes out on DVD and rent it.  It’s not worth the price of a ticket (at least not here in New York City).

Read Full Post »

NERD, Adrien Brody, Clive, Sarah Polley, biochemist,

We saw SPLICE tonight and unfortunately I arrived at theater without a clue about the subject matter.   First clue: There was no line when we arrived.  We were actually first in line and that was a first! Second Clue: SPLICE? What kind of title is that? My father was always splicing some wire into another wire. Third Clue: There was no line because there were hardly any SAG members in the theater.  I must have missed the memo! Fourth Clue: The beginning credits were growing out of various forms of ectoplasm like the infamous Exorcist phrase “Help Me”.

And Adrien Brody – oh my!! From Academy Award Best Actor Winner to Biochemist Nerd Clive, subjugated spouse to a 21st Century Eve seductively leading Adam into the Garden of Good and Evil  all in the name of research! Poor Clive is so p w that he not only finds himself doing the bidding of his ego-maniacal wife as they travel down the road of research way too far! Immoral, unethical, egotistical, self-aggrandizing and incestuous too!

Here’s a near spoiler-free synopsis (courtesy of Travis Saunders/The Lincoln Journal): A couple who have been romantically involved for some time are working on splicing DNA together to create other life forms.  They create some kind of synthetic monster baby who resembles a human, and they name her Dren.  The female scientist becomes attached to the creature in a motherly way, then chaos and horror ensues.

The scares are fulfilling most of the time, and sometimes the doomed mood is subtle.  Dren’s sex appeal is quite disturbing, because she isn’t all human, which creates a few uncomfortable, yet terrifying, moments, especially in the creepy, yet ridiculous third act.

What really shines in Splice is the art direction and special effects.  As far as horror goes, the settings are really creepy, even when they aren’t dark.  Guillermo del Toro is the executive producer, and a lot of his films are known for their awe-inspiring creatures, and Splice is no different here.

Splice has its moments of greatness, but is held back by its lack of going far enough in the right direction, and going too far in the wrong direction.  If you can stand to be seriously disturbed, and enjoy the horror / sci-fi genre, Splice may be something you could get into.  Those who don’t like sexually disturbing themes may want to stay away.

I have to admit that the movie is hard to describe, difficult to analyze and as I sit here trying to formulate an intelligent review, I remind myself how many times I said to myself during the movie; “Stupid” . However, it did have a couple of themes to which it remained true: parenting while making questionable decisions as the core of the film being the loss of rationality and objectivity when dealing with one’s offspring and throwing in a fair amount of disturbing sexuality.

I’m no fan of Horror Movies, monsters especially those with elongated heads and one eye are not my idea of characters I want to care about.  So I’m not sure I would recommend the movie, look I didn’t pay to see it…. it falls in middle ground, not a balls out monster flick and not exactly Raising Arizona either.

Sorry gang, I guess you’re on your own with this one, okay well not quite because I just tried to imagine encouraging someone to go see it and saying it out loud and all I could muster, was a hoarse whisper.

Read Full Post »

Amanda Seyfried is a very pretty up and coming actress – her looks are compelling.

Chloe, Sophie, Letters to Juliet, enhanced lips, luscious lips, actress, Amanda Seyfried
The Lovely Amanda

Peter thinks she’s beautiful so I always tell him that her lips are enhanced!  Well that’s just catty chit chat.  Anyway, Amanda was the protagonist in the  eponymous movie, Chloe where she played a sinister (my word) seductress.  Personally I thought she was evil and the movie was part Fatal Attraction and part True Lies.  Chloe was a calculating, unfeeling to the point of being robotic,  sociopath.  Spoiler – she gets hers in the end. Two weeks later we are watching the same doe-eyed luscious-lipped Amanda portraying Sophie in Letters to Juliet. Sophie is the ultimate eternal romanticist.  She is sweet, cloyingly adorable and an idealist in the romance department.  A very sweet romantic comedy and again she gets hers in the end. You would think that these two movies are poles apart but for some nagging reason,  I kept seeing parallels in the roles.  In both roles Amanda  shows us  a range of facial expressions; with her eyes as the windows into her heart and soul, she is wistful and waifish, her pouty mouth playing a big role.

Although this blog was basically about Amanda in her two recent starring roles, I want to point out that Vanessa Redgrave is in Letters to Juliet and although she is not starring in the main role, it is difficult to cast her as the supporting actress in this movie.  Her presence on the screen is nothing short of phenomenal – she is the focal point of every scene she’s in.   What a great role for her! AND for all you romanticists out there  who are now of a certain age, note this – Vanessa Redgrave and Franco Nero are a real life couple.

Vanessa Redgrave, Lynn Redgrave, Franco Nero, Letters to Juliet, Tuscany

It's Never Too Late For True Love

It was a poignant evening watching Vanessa’s magnificent performance one day after her sister, Lynn Redgrave passed away. Vanessa is the sole surviving member of the super talented Redgrave family.  This year, her brother Corin, also an actor, died as well.

Go see it! It’s heartwarming, sappy, funny, predictable and will make you cry happy tears and believe in true love.

Vanessa Redgrave, Amanda Seyfried, Letters to Juliet, Romeo and Juliet, Verona, Tuscany

Letters to Juliet

Best Quote: “I don’t think my grandmother would at all be interested in meeting someone who used ‘awesome’ and ‘oh my God’ in the same sentence. That was said by Christopher Egan who looks a lot like a young Val Kilmer.

Read Full Post »

Have you any idea why a raven is like a writing desk?” And with this non-sequitur we get a pretty good idea just how mad the Mad Hatter is! And Johnny Depp is the PERFECT  Mad Hatter.  After all we are talking about a superbly talented actor who has so convincingly portrayed such characters as Edward Scissorhands, Captain Jack Sparrow, Ed Wood, Ichabod Crane and Willie Wonka. In my opinion his star quality stole the scene whenever he was on screen in Alice in Wonderland. Anne Hathaway, Helena Bonham Carter and Mia Wasikowska were all very good in their roles but Johnny commands the screen.

I recommend seeing Alice in Wonderland but then again this is coming from a woman who owns 32 copies of Alice in Wonderland.  But you already knew I was a collector! – just in case you wonder what the category Peter Coddles is…that’s my collecting, and the name of a turn of the century parlor game.   Most of  the editions bear the original  John Tenniel illustrations.  I even have two copies in Spanish that I found in Argentina.

Would you like some tea?

But back to the movie, the 3-D effects are very good, however when the cards were running I thought they looked like runaway lobsters.  Put on your 3-D glasses and enjoy.  And by the way, this is NOT a kid’s movie – Off with their heads!

Read Full Post »

I just came home after seeing Crazy Heart and am more convinced than before that Jeff Bridges truly deserved the Best Actor Academy Award.  He was convincingly the aging, washed up, alcoholic country singer.

The best actors take the risks.  And they make it look easy, so easy in fact that you don’t even think they’re making it look easy. Jeff Bridges as Bad Blake was an outstanding example of an actor willing to let it all hang out, both figuratively and literally.  At 60 years old, he was brave enough to take off most of his clothes and let’s be honest, he wasn’t exactly sexy in his tighty whities.  Actually it was the scene in the movie where he vomits and lays down on the bathroom floor wearing only his underwear – that was when it really hit me….he was a drunk, moaning and then passing out.  Every expression, every movement of his body…. and then I realized, he’s NOT ALONE in this room; the cameramen, the lighting people, the grips, and the electricians, the script reader, set decorators, make-up and on and on are all around him – it’s almost unbelievable that he was so …. vulnerable!

And then as I said in my previous Oscar-related blog, when you compare his performance to that of his competition, there really wasn’t any competition.  That’s not to say that George Clooney and Morgan Freeman and Colin Firth aren’t great actors – they are.  The role and the depth of your character certainly plays a huge part in your ability to bring an Oscar home.  Even though you often read in a review the statement that the actor brought depth to the role , there are some roles that just don’t allow an actor to stretch. This blog is not about criticizing the other nominees or their roles; it’s only about singing the praises of Jeff Bridges in what surely was his best role ever.  Best Actor – Jeff Bridges Indeed!

Jeff Bridges as Bad Blake

Read Full Post »

As promised I am going to make my predictions for the winners of tonight’s Academy Awards.  So so much has been written about who will win, why they will win and who will lose.  There are predictions in every major newspaper, every Oscar and Academy Award website, every “social” website, all the Twitterers are ready to tweet; Perez Hilton, The Daily Beast and dozens and dozens more.  But before I add my predictions for the winners and wishes for those who won’t but in my opinion should….

I just want to quote my friend Gail who said as we were discussing how we were going to watch tonight’s show:  “Greed is good “ .  Peter and I were planning on going to a friend’s house along with another couple and the six of us would gather around Jim and Susan’s 40″ screen to see the show.  That was of course if ABC didn’t pull out of Cablevision because they weren’t receiving enough money or any at all – who knows?  All I know is we just may hosting the party with the 20″ TV without the flat screen and with a remote that can’t mute or lower the sound.  Fun fun fun.  Susan and Jim have come up with a couple of creative ideas – all of which are occupying most of this glorious sunny day in the Grove.  They’re inside, I’m inside and the other woman is working in her shop.  Later on I’m going to send Peter up the road to see if there really is a beach here.  So here’s the thing; ABC must be on skids (yeah right!), the Mouse must be as poor as his cousin, the churchmouse and Cablevision must be David to the Goliaths of Verizon and Time Warner but this time David is too poor to buy any stones.  Greed is Good or maybe Greed is God.

Now on the lighter more frivolous side, there is the politics of the Oscar game.  We have the two Exes battling for Best Director but they have conducted themselves just way to politely to make anybody’s gossip web site.  BUT maybe it would be very politically correct to have a woman win this year.  Just maybe.  Then there’s the politics of war itself.  Unusual to have a movie made about an ongoing war isn’t it? Is it politically correct?  Meryl Streep up for Best Actress in what seems to be a by a nose horse race with Sandra Bullock – Sandra Bullock?! NOT to be mean or catty but really now-she’s is just not in the same class as Meryl – BUT is the Academy getting tired of giving this grand dame of the screen yet another Oscar?  Hasn’t she won enough?  We’ve all been in a class, a race, a group where one person always wins and even though we know they are the best, we eventually begin to resent them.  Poor Meryl- she may lose tonight because politically it would be so correct to bring Sandra Bullock into the Winner’s Circle and get some fresh new blood, uh wouldn’t it?  Meryl Streep gave an outstanding performance is Julia and Julia further proving (and she doesn’t have to prove anything) that as an actress she can stretch herself across the lines to a Jewess during the Holocaust, a middle-aged woman in a torrid love affair and a hard-driving female editor and each time she totally embodies her character as she recently did as the affable and lovable Julia Child.  We’ll see just how far politics goes tonight.  And in the same vein, Jeff Bridges seems to have already wrapped up Best Actor although I haven’t seen it yet, the reviews all say he was marvelous in the role and hopefully he will win it because of his performance and NOT because it’s his time. When you look at the other nominees and their roles, I think he should win easily.  Best Supporting Actor may have some political overtones too.  Word is that Christophe Waltz will walk away with the Oscar and politically you know how easy it is to hate Nazis and he played on mean Nazi bastard – not to be confused with being a Basterd. However, it is also easy to hate a child molester, and God knows Stanley Tucci’s performance was chillingly brilliant.  Personally I think that role was much harder than playing the all too familiar (almost predictable character) Nazi SS Colonel.  Not sure if there is any politics involved here but I think Tucci should win but he won’t.  Of course the most political of all the moves the Academy made this year was in nominating 10 movies. Not going there, already did (read a previous blog).  Populist Politics seemed rampant this year – let’s see what happens tonight.  The newbies in the races are there to appease the public who pays to go see movies and be entertained, however they don’t get to vote.

Here are my predictions: Best Picture – The Hurt Locker I didn’t think any of them were Best Picture caliber except maybe Avatar with its new technology. Best Actor – Jeff Bridges – the others, no big stretch. Best Actress – Meryl Streep – I think Sandra might win after all. Best Supporting Actor – Christophe Waltz I wish Stanley would win.Best Supporting Actress – Mo’Nique. Best Director – Kathryn Bigelow.  Costume Design – Young Victoria at first I thought Coco Before Channel should win but there is no denying the scope and magnificence of the designer’s period work, even though period films often do win. Cinematography- Inglourious Basterds I’m not knowledgeable enough to really understand the requirements for this award so Avatar may win but I didn’t pick it because so much of it was computer generated. Best Original Screenplay -A Serious Man –this won’t win but to me the others were stories just waiting to be told again in film. Best Adapted ScreenplayPrecious – I think it should win something (now who’s being political?) and believe the actors brought the story to life. “That’s all folks”  “See you at the movies”

Read Full Post »

Inglourious Basterds

Countdown to the Academy Awards.  With 7 days left I have seen 7 of the 10 films; the latest was Inglorious Basterds.  I thought Hurt Locker was intense, and this was similarly nerve-wracking.  A little too violent for me -you know scalping scenes tend to be bloody! Brad Pitt was the big basterd and he was okay but this certainly was no stretch for him and you notice he was NOT nominated for an Oscar.  The accent/voice he was obviously directed to use,  was horrific.  And talk about a stretch – did any one of the characters  or anyone in the audience actually think his character was going to be able to pull off a believable Italian? Sounding like that?  That being said, I can’t imagine this movie winning Best Picture, BUT I am sure that Christopher Waltz will dance away (pun intended) with the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor.  Now that character was really the biggest basterd of all. Portraying a viciously exacting and and clever SS Colonel, he was outstanding! God it was so easy to hate him..

The probability of seeing the remaining three; Precious, Up, and The Blind Side are slim to none.  However, I am hoping to catch Crazy Heart before Sunday because I do want to see Jeff Bridges in this role.  Check in later this week if you’re interested to hear my predictions.

Read Full Post »

Countdown to Oscar night is underway and wow – TEN??!! This year the Academy in its infinite wisdom or rather a knee jerk reaction to last year’s uproar over the omission of The Dark Knight from the nominee list has nominated TEN that’s right TEN movies in the Best Picture category.  Lest they overlook anybody or any film whether it’s REALLY deserving or not, to be in that vaulted category.   Think about Up in the Air and then think about A Gentleman’s Agreement, In the Heat of the Night and All Quiet on the Western Front.  Compare if you will Blind Side to All About Eve, Rebecca or Midnight Cowboy.  Believe if you will that Up was nominated but ET never was!  A Serious Man or Ghandi or Marty??  An Education in the same class as Gone With the Wind, How Green Was My Valley and On the Waterfront?  Having just watched The Hurt Locker which was extraordinarily realistic and thankfully lacking in major amounts of computer generated special effects and really was intense – it was not quite Mutiny on the Bounty, Lawrence of Arabia or From Here to Eternity.  And then there was The Godfather, Schindler’s List and Casablanca!!!!  For all of our advanced steps in technology which allow a director to have an indigenous people  fly on blue banshees, I think we’re going backwards in the overall caliber and quality of movies today.  Re: the title of this blog – out of the TEN, I’ve seen six and hence………

Hi I'm Oscar

Read Full Post »

Snowed in has turned out to be a pleasurable and educational experience for me.  Although physically attached to the keyboard,  I have been watching and listening to an amazing documentary about Dalton Trumbo.  Our friend Paul gave it to Peter and I am embarrassed to admit that I did not know who he was.  It’s because (my lack of awareness) I tended to get lost in the story  and then run to the ladies’ room while the credits were running.  Further, even though I went to numerous Oscar parties,  we never seemed to vote for the screenwriter.  Now however, since I met Peter and he has educated me in  deeper appreciation of movies especially the making of such and the people are involved in that process – well now I read the credits.

As it turns out this documentary was just WONDERFUL and the cast of actors who read and spoke was stellar.  Donald Sutherland, Michael and Kirk Douglas, David Straithemand Liam Niesson  just to name a few.  Their distinctive sonorous voices gave a glorious depth to the writings of Dalton Trumbo.  He wrote the MOST eloquent letters during his lifetime.  To say he had a command of the English language is such a trite understatement and not worthy of use in descriing Trumbo’s talent.  Again I have to say how ridiculous it was of me NOT to know that he wrote the screenplays for Exodus, Pappillion, Spartacus, and The Brave One.  The Brave One won him an Academy Award which he could not pick up!! Which brings me to the REAL essence of this movie.  Dalton Trumbo was blacklisted by that most heinous of American tragedies – The House Un-American Activities Committee.  How the Hollywood Ten suffered and how lives were destroyed and careers abruptly halted is a thing of shame.  A great documentary showing the evils of McCarthyism and the genius of Dalton Trumbo.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts