Wellllll I went to see Sex and the City2 and it was 2 long, 2 dumb, 2 short on plot, 2 predictable, and 2 cartoonish.
If this site was Rotten Tomatoes I would give it 3 rotten tomatoes which by the way is pretty close to what the movie has gotten on that site. As of tonight, Sex and the City2 has received 150 rotten tomatoes out of 179 reviews. I knew that it had been getting bad reviews but I really did want to see it. I DID enjoy the first movie and well I did hope that this one would be somewhat good. NOT!
It was too long, it dragged in places, the clothes that Carrie wore throughout the first part of the movie were ugly, Mario Cantone was totally wasted in the movie – I don’t mean he was wasted, I mean his talent was wasted. He had the most inane lines, what a disappointment! The wedding scene was so over the top gay that it was a cartoon.
When the show was on, the characters almost seemed believable; maybe because at that time, I had my daughter Chiara living with me and she and her entourage looked the part, dressed the part and partied the part! BUT in the movie tonight I felt like I was watching a cast of reality show contestants; there was Carrie and Mr. Big as the hip New York childless couple, Miranda as the smart control freak, more lawyer than lover and mother, Charlotte the obessive by the rules girl, feeling guilty because she thinks she’s supposed to feel guilty and of course Samantha the over-sexed going over the hill 4th. Samantha was probably the most caricatured character of them all. The woman who loved to love men on the show was now portrayed as an aging, hormone junkie who sits at her desk with her panties around her ankles, rubbing cream into her V Jay Jay! There is nothing attractive about a crude mouthed menopausal nymphomaniac (nymphomania is a mental illness).
Now if the movie was supposed to be a spoof, a comical satirical view of not so young single women who mostly were not single anymore, then you could overlook the over the top portrayals – but it wasn’t that kind of movie. It took itself much more seriously than that. Carrie and Mr. Big reveled in their special two-ness, their just me and you-ness.
As far as a fashion statement, I thought the clothes worn by the girls when they were in Abu Dhabi were wild and interesting and for the most part flattering. AND I guess we can expect to see that four leaf clover necklace on every pre-teenage girl in the coming months.
My advice – wait till it comes out on DVD and rent it. It’s not worth the price of a ticket (at least not here in New York City).









INCEPTION-What’s All the Twitter About?
Posted in BY THE WAY, From My Point of View - Personal commentary on Movies and Books, Smooth or Crunchy, tagged Christophe Nolan, Inception, New Yorker review on July 29, 2010| Leave a Comment »
If you Twitter and follow the Trending Worldwide list you know that Inception has been on the list for more than a week!!! That in itself is pretty unusual, almost unheard of in this day of today you’re hot and tomorrow you’re yesterday’s news – however the unknown number of Tweets devoted to this science fiction fantasy designed to mind-fuck the viewer, has to be in the thousands. That kind of statistic should be enough to blow your mind never mind having to watch a movie that you’re never sure you’re watching anyway.
The Dream is REAL
Maybe I didn’t see it after all – it could have been a manufactured dream by Christopher Nolan or was I just a projectionist in Leo’s mind. Well if I didn’t see it, I hope I wake up soon-hey that was one of the best lines in the movie! “Wake me up, wake me up”!
A gazillion dollar mega-movie designed to capture the insipid and the imaginative summer movie goer’s mind. Well the timing couldn’t have been better. I ‘ll bet there were more people going to see this movie in the Northeast than anyplace else. Perfect formula: heat and humidity hovering in the 90’s for weeks, summer mind set as you wait for a two week vacation or regret that it’s already come and gone, supply several movie houses all icily air-conditioned and playing Inception and whammo, you’ve got a full house every day.
Let me share with you what some of the professional reviewers are saying:
Inception,” is an astonishment, an engineering feat, and, finally, a folly. Nolan has devoted his extraordinary talents not to some weighty, epic theme or terrific comic idea but to a science-fiction thriller that exploits dreams as a vehicle for doubling and redoubling action sequences. He has been contemplating the movie for ten years, and as movie technology changed he must have realized that he could do more and more complex things. He wound up overcooking the idea. Nolan gives us dreams within dreams (people dream that they’re dreaming); he also stages action within different levels of dreaming—deep, deeper, and deepest, with matching physical movements played out at each level—all of it cut together with trombone-heavy music by Hans Zimmer, which pounds us into near-deafness, if not quite submission. Now and then, you may discover that the effort to keep up with the multilevel tumult kills your pleasure in the movie. “Inception” is a stunning-looking film that gets lost in fabulous intricacies, a movie devoted to its own workings and to little else. Read more http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/cinema/2010/07/26/100726crci_cinema_denby#ixzz0v5DYs7Fz
Are they handing out joints at the box office for this?
Rate this:
Read Full Post »