Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘From My Point of View – Personal commentary on Movies and Books’ Category

Red Tails, Tuskagee Air Men, fighter pilots, George Lucas,

Red Tail Airplane

Can you imagine yourself sitting in the cockpit of a P-47, a refurbished hand-me-down plane?  Better yet, imagine you’re piloting this plane as it soars, dips, twists and dodges strafing bullets.  Well if you can’t imagine it, then head to your local movie theater and watch RED TAILS.  In the first 10 minutes of the film, you WILL feel like you’ve been flying, swooping down to attack a German munitions train.

The special effects  are worthy of a blog post of their own, however, this writer doesn’t have the technical knowledge or background to speak intelligently on the subject.  All I can tell you is that they are phenomenal and the movie credits  list no less than 100 digital artists.

It took George Lucas, that Hollywood icon, twenty years to produce this film about a story begging to be told.  And it was about time!  Thank you George!

HOWEVER….

The dialogue is lame and wooden BUT the battle scenes are spectacular, thanks to those 100+ digital artists.  The main story line is between two pilots, the squadron leader and the reckless hotshot.  Much like Maverick and Ice Man in Top Gun. The script is highly predictable with way too obvious foreshadowing.

There are a lot of good actors in this film, however unfortunately their characters are as complex as cardboard game pieces stating the obvious. Their lives are never fleshed out and we never learn any of their back stories.  Even the make up of the squadron is formulaic: There is the alcohol abuser son trying desperately to please Daddy, , a testosterone – charged ladies man and daredevil,  a devoutly religious good boy, and the eager fresh meat new recruit.  Almost as typical as a reality TV show cast.

For those of you too young to “get” the title of this blog,…There was a very popular song in the 1950’s entitled, Red Sails in the Sunset  and the 332nd fighter group aka the Red Tails always took off at sunrise.

Read Full Post »

Oakland Athletics

Oakland Athletics

MONEYBALL

Well, I’ll tell ya – you can’t!  Especially if you are watching this year’s under-rated film, Moneyball.  On the other hand, given Brad Pitt‘s star quality, it’s hard to say the movie was under-rated, but I do think it hasn’t generated any “buzz” the way say, The Iron Lady, The Descendents and Incredibly Close and Extremely Loud has.  However, let’s clarify that even further; Those three films and most especially the Tom Hanks movie which must be advertised on TV at least 15 times a day have gotten a lot of press, a lot of billboard space and a lot of attention by reviewers.   My God, you would think Incredibly Close and Extremely Loud was the epic sequel to Ben Hur or Forrest Gump!

But back to Moneyball; I had the delightful opportunity to view this movie in my own home, sitting cosily on my couch, drinking hot chocolate while it snowed outside on a Saturday afternoon.  It was surprisingly wonderful and engaging. You don’t even have to be a sports fan to love it!  Brad Pitt gives Billy Beane the look of a former athlete still very much in shape, and his performance is superb.

First of all who doesn’t love baseball?  After all it is our national pastime or pass time.  The storyline isn’t exactly new since we’ve all seen the the evolution of a rag tag team reaching ultimate victory – ie  Miracle– True story of the 1980 US Olympic Hockey team or A League of Their Own.   However, the treatment of this story line takes the viewer to the ball park and back, into the locker room and best of all into the psyche of  the General Manager of the Oakland Athletics.

Billy Beane is a conflicted and somewhat lonely man, recovering from a failed marriage and a losing season.  He lives, works, eats and sometimes sleeps baseball – except when he is with his daughter who he apparently dotes on. Casey is charmingly played by Kerris Dorsey,  a sweet pre-teen who lives with her mom and stepdad and regularly visits her father.

Billy is driven to succeed which in his mind translates into winning the last game.  He truly believes it doesn’t matter how many games you win because  if you don’t win the last one (World Series) then your achievements as well as yourself are just erased.*  The problem he faces is that his player salary is so low, he feels he can’t compete with the deep pocket of teams like the New York Yankess who regularly raid his best players, luring them with astronomical salaries.  What is General Manager supposed to do?  So for him in one respect it was all about winning, yet on the other hand, he aspired to change the game in a way that would level the economic playing field (no pun intended) between the so-called rich teams and poor teams, the Oakland A’s being of the latter.  He is quoted as saying to his genius Assistant General Manager, (Joshua Hill) that he believed in their new and highly technical process of forming a winning team, not for the  money or the ring, but because he wanted to change the game.  Out with the old (literally) men/scouts and their ideas of what makes a great ballplayer and in with the new analytical technology. Adapt or die.

By season’s  end the team is winning and Beane is called to Boston, where he is offered the position of GM for the Boston Red Sox by the owner of the team who extolls the genius of his new selection process and who clearly states it is the wave of the future!  Hence, Billy has in fact changed the game.  So why is he so disenchanted?  I’m not positive but he was consistent in his quest to win the big one here in his home town.  There are many camera shots of Billy as a young Little League player wearing the green tee shirt of the Oakland A’s.  He failed dismally as the baseball great, so many scouts thought he was to be so perhaps he had something to prove to himself and Oakland.   And then factor in the daughter who does not want him to leave California and move far away from her.  It’s hard to leave home and in the end he doesn’t.  

The acting was terrific in this movie;  Phillip Seymour Hoffman as the bullet-headed, big gut manager was convincing. The character actors who played the various scouts and coaches sitting around the table were remarkably true to life and hardly seemed like actors, they were so natural. 

One last word about Pitt.  Sometimes when a star is a star and on screen, all you can really see is the star.  Very few transcend their celebrity and embody a character so well that you stop  seeing the actor and see only the character.  Meryl Streep is an excellent example and Brad Pitt as Billy Beane is another.

* Props to the Director who worked with the technical department – at the end of the movie, the players slowly disappear or rather are erased.

Read Full Post »

Lots of things come in three’s and this week it was movies.  We’ve seen HUGO 3D,  WarHorse, and The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo.

We went to see HUGO 3D and enjoyed the imagery and of course the “new” 3D technology.  Everyone we know who went to see this movie, raved about it so we were prepped to see a Scorsese masterpiece.  We didn’t.  IF it was meant to be just a children’s film, then I guess you could overlook the fact that Hugo as a character was endowed with such specialness, he might as well have been on Dora The Explorer.  He was too unreal for me and perhaps that’s what distracted me from some of the film’s attributes.  I  alternated between thinking of Hugo as Harry Potter and Hermione when he spent time with Isabella.  She was so like Hermione.  And then,  he would bring to mind the young boy, Trevor in Pay It Forward

The movie was about movies and Scorsese meant to show us just how much he loves movies and making them.  Don’t you think it’s odd that this homage to hand-cranked cameras and hand-tinted frames was presented to us in stereoscopic digital 3D?

Next we went to see War Horse.   Peter was hesitant about going and I was a little apprehensive because neither of us wants to watch any form of animal cruelty.  Of course we know it’s “just a movie and no horses got hurt”  but of they did get hurt and killed in the war and so just watching it was probably going to be upsetting.

Again, everyone who had seen the play was raving about how moving it was.  Well of course it was moving…it’s easy to get an audience to care and cry about a beautiful horse who overcomes every obstacle and is a character so special, it becomes fantasy and not at all believable .  In my opinion, the characters were trite; the drunken Irish farmer, the pragmatic and loyal working-her-fingers-to-the-bone wife, the dutiful son, the evil landlord and his snotty kid – they were all present.  The horse was a magnificent animal just like Lassie was a beautiful dog.  Honestly, the movie was pretty reminiscent of Lassie Come Home. 

No question that the acting was fine, the cinematography was beautiful, the editing, superb.  However, the movie itself, was just so predictable.  The scene where the British soldier and the German one free the horse from barbed wire was a little over the top.  And I mean, really…the horse actually ends up on the battlefield where his former owner is recuperating from an injury incurred during the attack?? 

Two down and two thumbs down – The Third One’s The Charm! 

Scorsese-MainPageMartin Scorsese


Read Full Post »

This is a book you will love to give to a younger person on your gift list. It’s hard to really say what the age range is for a Shel Silverstein book – they have such wide appeal and the adults reading them to kids enjoy the life lessons contained within as much as the kids enjoy the precious drawings.

I read the Giving Tree to my kids so many times, I think we all had it memorized.  Silverstein’s newest book is Every Thing On It.  It’s a compilation of previously unpublished poems and drawings by Shel. It will capture the hearts of the young and not-so-young for years to come.

Shel Silverstein, The Giving Tree,

Every Thing On It

Read Full Post »

US actor George Clooney

George Clooney

That’s what I wondered after the first 15 minutes of The Descendents.  Even though the opening scene has George Clooney disclaiming the myth of Hawaii  as a perfect paradise,  it’s hard to let go of our illusions or delusions for that matter.

There have been so many rave reviews about this movie already, I’m not sure what my two cents could possibly add.  Many reviewers have been citing Clooney’s performance as his best yet.  I had heard that before I saw the movie and attributed it to the usual hype.  I thought George was great in Michael Clayton, Good Night and Good Luck and Syrianna.   However, those movies were big Hollywood production and his characters were big.  The Descendents,  seemed more like a small movie, not quite and Indie but other than the panoramic shots of Hawaii, we watched an intimate movie.  Actor Clooney showed us a wide range of emotions mostly played out on his face.  He truly seemed to embody the character of Matt King.

Special note should be given to the young actress, Shailene Woodley.  Most of her prior acting experience has been as a lead character on the TV series, The Secret Life of an American Teenager.  She is confident, fresh and handles herself with great ease in the presence of a star, and is able to hold her own in every scene.  I think an Oscar nomination might be in her very near future!

The story itself is poignant at times, a little slow at times and as directed by Alexander Payne, I felt I was watching one part About Schmidt and one part of the eternally long novel, Hawaii by Mitchner.  It was beautifully acted, the portrayal of the human condition handled exquisitely by Clooney. 

Read Full Post »

The Seal of the United States Federal Bureau o...

The Federal Bureau of Investigagtion

Not necessarily healthy, mature love or balanced, equitable relationships negotiated between two or more adults.  No, instead it was more about obsession, control, immaturity, desperation,  loyalty, fidelity, commitment.

Let’s start with LIKE CRAZY.  Superbly acted by Felicity Jones and Anton Yelchin, LIKE CRAZY is a love story about two young college students who think they are in love.  They probably are in love or at least as they define love.  It seemed to have a lot to do with sex, fantasy and a disregard for life as it is with rules and boundaries as only two young people wrapped up in their own world perceive it.

Really it’s about love, that  beautiful precious emotional gift,  mishandled by two immature kids.  Basically that’s the problem here – Jacob and Anna are just too immature to grasp what love and commitment really mean.  Patience! That one word engraved on the bracelet given to Anna by Jacob was the key to creating a deep and lasting relationship.  They talked the talk, but couldn’t walk the walk.  Maturity knows patience, maturity understands that it isn’t necessary to indulge your every desire in order to be happy.

Final thought: Anna’s parents came off as way too liberal psuedo-hippies from another era.

J. Edgar

Now here is tale or two of twisted love….a doting mother whose love was controlling, compulsive and suffocating and lavished on a son eager for Mommy’s approval in all things.  Dame Judi Dench embodied the role of this overbearing and obsessive mother.  Edgar was her favorite, Edgar was destined to be a great man and she was the stage mother in the background, directing and advising on everything from the clothes he wore to commanding him to find the Lindberg baby.  Edgar was devoted to his mother, turning to her for counsel, revering her and escorting her to political functions as his date.  The only other woman in his life was Miss Gandy, his personal secretary who was not only the gate-keeper, she was also his trusted secret-keeper.

And then Clyde Tolsen is introduced to the Director of the FBI and in a swift series of meaningful glances, we know that Clyde is destined to be in Hoover’s life.  Almost laughably transparent in his intent, Hoover arranges for Tolsen to be accepted into the Bureau even though as a candidate, Tolsen has none of the desired qualities.  But he is tall and good-looking.  In this day and age, homosexuality is understood, acknowledged and acceptable in most circles.  NOT in those days.  It was apparent that J. Edgar was somewhat conflicted, alternating between  assuming an almost asexual ascetic life and craving the companionship that Clyde so eagerly offered.  Although there were moments of tenderness between Tolsen and Hoover, their relationship was not consumated, at least not in this depiction.  Poor Clyde was ever the faithful puppy dog sidekick, thankful for any random ear-scratching that Edgar rarely bestowed.  

We don’t know how much of this movie is based on fact or historical fiction.  After all, Hoover appeared to be a very private man and the only two people who could know the intimate side of him (Miss Gandy and Clyde Tolsen) did not talk!

Overall I found the movie interesting because it was a biopic, but I didn’t think it was an exceptionally good movie.  I expected more from Clint Eastwood than a laundry list of Hoovers triumphs and failures.  Of course it was hard for me to spend 2 hours in the life of a man who I believe was misguided by his obsessiveness and evil in his vindictiveness.  Also not for a minute was I not aware that DiCaprio was the actor behind the make-up.  I don’t know if that’s because of mis-casting or bad acting – I believe it to be the former.

Read Full Post »

Seamlessly weaving his story with flashbacks and the present,  director Sean Durkin presents a low-key thriller from the perspective of a young, unstable woman (think Black Swan).  The opening scene transports us to a seemingly bucolic setting, a slightly rundown farmhouse, men hammering and women mending, a couple of kids, in a remote area which is tucked into the hills of the Catskills.  We meet Martha who meets Patrick who quickly anoints her Marcy May,  and by doing so, rebirths her into a new life in the cult commune. His eyes tell it all; they’re penetrating, his look sinister yet seductive , his voice sincere (think Charles Manson).   This is a psychological thriller and within moments, apprehension and anxiety begin to mount.

From there, the story unfolds with Marcy May running away from the cult and going to live with her estranged sister.  They are awkward with one another;  Guilt weighing on Lucy, frustration consuming Ted (Lucy’s husband) and increasing paranoia in Martha.  Flashbacks fill in the blanks and introduce the viewers to the life Marcy May led under the strange manipulative  influence of Patrick.  

The present deals with Martha who is tortured by her twisted desire to go back to the commune and her revulsion of what went on there.  Her mind wanders back and forth between the past and the present, and she slips in and out of reality.   Martha resists telling her clueless sister where she was and with who, but wouldn’t you think that after the third totally inappropriate episode with  Martha, Lucy would persist in discovering the what and where of Martha’s last two years?  Instead  we hear  “What’s wrong with you”? Plenty!

By the time the movie ended, I was as paranoid as Marcy May; she got under my skin and I couldn’t shake her off. The baffling and somewhat infuriating ending only added to my distress.

Spoiler Alert: “All the children are boys”. “He only has boys”.  Who’s buried in the backyard? We see two or three white crosses in the backyard in the first scene.

Elizabeth Olsen(sister of the twins) makes her debut and leaves no doubt that she is on her way to a career in film.  John Hawkes is compelling, scary and yes sexy.  Sarah Paulson and Hugh Dancy co-star in this Sundance favorite.

Elizabeth Olsen, Sarah Paulson, John Hawkes, Sundance film festival, Marcy May

Martha Marcy May Marlene

Read Full Post »

Group photo in front of Clark University Sigmu...

Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung

In the opening scene of A Dangerous Method , we see a young woman screaming and fighting, desperately trying to escape the restraints of two men.  The carriage pulls up to a large building set in the beautiful landscape of Switzerland and she is dragged into the psychiatric hospital of Dr. Carl Jung.

As the movie unfolds, we are witness to both the  evolution of a burgeoning science as well as the growing relationship between Jung and Freud and Jung and Sabina (Keira Knightly).  At times, it was difficult to discern if the movie was a drama about an illicit love affair, the inner turmoil wrought on a physician who crossed a line or a historical pseudo-documentary about the struggle to get psychiatry recognized as a viable means to cure mental illness.

When a movie can’t decide which genre it is, it’s usually in the purgatory between the two.  I didn’t love the movie:  It was slow-moving, quiet, and fairly dry.  It’s not that I wanted to see  psychotic scenes such as there was in the movie, Quills.  No fortunately we were spared the fascination with excrement and masturbation.

In my opinion, the best part of the movie was watching Keira Knightly portray a severely mentally disturbed woman.  Sabina’s illness manifested itself in violent bodily contortions, grinding teeth, chin jutted out, eyes rolling wildly.  There have been some reviewers who called her performance over-the-top, however, I think Keira was extremely compelling.  And as her treatment progressed, she deftly portrayed a woman emerging from the depths of despair and depression to an articulate student of psychiatry,  only to become a renowned psychiatrist in her own right years later.

Viggo Mortensen played a somewhat arrogant Freud, stubborn and rigid in his beliefs, very well.  Michael Fassbender portrayed the elegant Carl Jung equally as well.

If you like period movies, this one is shot accurately and beautifully.  As for historical facts, we are allowed to peek into the lives of the two greatest psychiatrists of the 20th Century.  Perhaps to add some spice to the movie (sex sells anything, they say), you also get to be a bit of a voyeur as the affair between Jung and Sabina plays out.  Unfortunately or fortunately, the spice is not so much in the sex but in S&M foreplay.  Not quite titillating enough to be steamy but replete with historical facts, the movie, overall, is somewhat entertaining and adds another dimension in David Cronenberg’s exploration of the human mind.

Read Full Post »

Actor and film director Roman Polański.

Roman Polanski

Two nights, two movies back to back !

It was HYSTERICAL – CARNAGE  (spoiler alert)

With the title CARNAGE, you don’t exactly expect to howl throughout the movie.  However, that’s what happened as the audience roared, laughed, snickered and giggled all the way through to the credits.  Roman Polanski‘s latest film is a not- quite-dark adaptation of a darkly humorous play.  Actually, instead of the black farce is was meant to be, I found it to be more light gray.

Fifteen minutes into the movie, I thought I was watching a comedic version of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolfe? .   I’m not sure it was meant to be quite that funny but it was. I wondered if it was hysterical because the characters were more like caricatures?  Maybe, but for that matter, Martha and George caricatures.  No one laughed out loud watching Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton turn a social evening into a knock-down, drag-out verbal battle waged throughout the night.

Shot in the style of a Woody Allen film, four people are figuratively locked in the Brooklyn living room of Penelope (Jodie Foster) and Michael (John C. Reilly) Longstreet, the parents of Ethan.   Presumably an amiable meeting is to take place between Nancy and Alan, the parents of Zachary who attacked  Ethan and disfigured him by knocking out some teeth.   These graphic descriptive accusations are  sharp retorts from the horrified Penelope.  She is just so shocked by the parenting skills or lack thereof of Nancy (Kate Winslet) and Alan (Christoph Waltz).  Nancy and Alan just want  to avoid a lawsuit and get the hell out of there! NOT an easy task ! Although they make it out the door a couple of times and even get as far as the elevator, they cannot leave. They are repeatedly pulled back into the web of guilt woven relentlessly by Penelope.

Jodie Foster was well-cast as the uptight, self-righteous, know-it-all Bohemian mother hen.  She is so brittle, you’re sure she will crack and crumble the next time she tightly wraps her arms around herself.  She was believable as Penelope up to a point.  However, by the end of the movie, Jodie is shrieking like a banshee with her face contorted like an appopletic lunatic.  I blame Mr. Polanski for this over-the-top performance.  A shame, because prior to this melt-down, Penelope and her shoulds were amusing.

Kate Wynslet delivered a superb performance as the resigned wife of a rude, self-involved attorney a la Betty Draper (Mad Men), right up to the blonde French twist hair-do.  The audience roared when the  prim and properly groomed Nancy tosses her cookies onto the coffee table and all over Penny’s precious Oskar Kokoschka book – OH the horror of it all!!

The films best lines were all Alan’s, with his omnipresent cell phone. After the 15th annoying ring, I lost count.  A rude, crude misogynist, bored with his wife, his life and certainly this ridiculous charade of meeting.  The cobbler doesn’t do much to assuage his ennui, but the single malt scotch is right on.

Michael morphs from Mr. Nice Guy into a blustering insensitive boor who openly admits to freeing or murdering (depends on who’s speaking) his daughter’s hamster.  I felt the transition was not clear or obvious, again this is the work of the director.

And the hamster lived happily ever after!

I was going to comment on It was HistoricalA Dangerous Method but this post is already long and it’s after midnight, so check back in a day or two!

Read Full Post »

Contagion  is what happens when the wrong pig meets up with the wrong bat. 

Sitting at a bar, you reach into the bowl of peanuts, a waiter picks up an empty glass, the school nurse takes a young boy’s temperature…all these and more seemingly innocent and every day occurrences are caught on camera and through the genius of editing, the lens lingers  ever so slightly longer than normal.  And there you have it; the path of a rapid, virulent, super bug virus as it swiftly travels along the road paved with human touch.  We don’t realize how much of what we do, and what we touch affects other people until something like this heretofore undiscovered and unnamed virus begins its deadly trip around the world.

The movie moves forward while flashback snippets in the form of video surveillance camera footage step backward and show us just how Beth (Gwyneth Paltrow) became patient zero and set off an outbreak of MEV-1 and a pandemic nightmare.  The portentous device of posting the day and date timeline on the screen brings the horror of how quickly a virus can multiply and spread exponentially, decimating the huge populations of such cities like, Los Angeles, Chicago, Minneapolis, and more.

Director Steven Soderberg brings his genius of fast-moving, everything-happening-at-once style he used so effectively in Traffic to this his latest work.  There’s no grandstanding, no spiritual or religious overtones to wring out your emotions.  No, this film plays it straight and factual.  We are terrified, horrified and shaken, but not because we’ve been exposed to (no pun intended) to half-dead zombies stumbling across the screen.  Instead, the camera pans through a deserted airport, sweeps over trash littered streets and lines of desperate citizens standing in line for government hand-outs of food. 

The real heroes in this movie are intelligent government employees and level-headed scientists.  Matt Damon gives a fine performance as the cuckolded husband of Beth, his best moment is at the hospital when he fails to comprehend the fact that his wife is dead.  Kate Winslet delivers a solid performance as the field agent who gets sent out to Minnesota to head up government disaster containment. 

By far in my opinion, Jude Law was the outstanding star in the movie.  It was hard to believe that the scuzzy guy with the bad complexion and rotten teeth was really Jude Law.  Playing a disgruntled left winged blogger, he incites the masses with his inflammatory, accusatory diatribes against the CDC and the pharmaceutical companies.  Conspiracy theories are full blown! 

This movie is certainly worth the price of admission.  It’s a  brilliantly directed film dealing with a terrifyingly grim subject, and one that the audience quickly realizes is all to close to reality.   With SARS, H1N1, AIDS and ebola and ecoli outbreaks in our recent past, this movie resurrects the fear of contagion and births new concerns about biological warfare…and well it should.

A coronavirus that may cause SARS. (transwikie...

SARS Virus

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »