Saw the highly acclaimed movie, The King’s Speech last night, and even as I write this, I’m not sure what I’m going to say about it. Well let me begin with this; I didn’t think it was as good as I expected it to be. Of course that could be the age-old problem of way too much hype in the media and from your friends before you actually see it. I don’t know what I expected, I just know I didn’t get it.
There were at least two story lines that I thought should have been played out a little more; I know the movie was about Albert BUT really…the whole Wallis Simpson/Duke of Windsor thing could have gotten a few more scenes. It was only in the remarks made by the other characters that were telling about the affair and the effects of it upon the royal family and the nation. Funny thing about it is that growing up and never having read anything about the abdication of King Edward, but knowing about somehow, I always thought of it as some romantic love affair, truly l’affaire de couer. And I guess it was truly a love affair since after all the man DID give away his throne for the divorced and married Wallis. In this movie, however, even with such minimal scenes devoted to it, the relationship seemed sordid, unhealthy and foolish.
The other area where I think the audience was left wondering was in the repeated attempts of the Duke of York to deliver a speech or address an audience. In the fist moments of the film, we see the agonizing efforts of the young Albert fiercely trying to talk into the wireless in his futile attempts to deliver an address to a large crowd at the British Empire Exhibition. This is the first of many painful public humiliations we are witness to during the movie. Each time we are only treated to a beginning line or two and then the scene changes. I do understand that his abortive attempts and gaping silences are enough for us to get the idea that his stammering is excruciating to him, his family and his subjects. BUT – how did he get through those speeches? In some of the scenes it is clear that his throat is almost paralyzed and his tongue completely tied. So what happened? I kind of thought in the first scene that his wife was going to jump out of her seat and take over for him! Well that was before I saw the rest of the movie which consistently reminded the viewer of the strict adherence to protocol the royal family so intensely clung.
And now the good part; Colin Firth is magnificent! His portrayal of the stuttering, stammering, frail, sickly boy grown up into a shy, withdrawing and self-deprecating younger brother to the soon-to-be-king is flawless. He embodies the character, completely. Firth’s ability to go from silence into rage is remarkable as his ability to put himself on-screen rolling about on the floor, flapping his lips, waggling his head and jumping up and down with Geoffrey Rush – the two of them looked like monkeys playing, lol.
Colin’s performance clearly puts him high up in the Best Actor category. Quite frankly, I don’t know who could beat him. A few month’s ago, I wrote a review about The Social Network and I praised Jesse Eisenberg‘s performance as Mark Zuckerberg as nothing less than superbly wonderful (see prior blog: The Social Network). And it was and he surely should be nominated for Best Actor but in my opinion he shouldn’t win because as good as he was, Colin was better and had the more difficult role.
Geoffrey Rush will be nominated for Best Supporting Actor as well he should be; I hope he wins. And certainly NOT to be overlooked is the cinematography, the lighting was so exquisitely natural you forget that it’s lighting.
Final Thoughts: Guy Pearce was smooth and handsome as the Duke of Windsor, unfortunately he was completely obsessed (as portrayed in this movie) with a woman of a questionable background so I no longer think of him as a hopeless romantic but rather a weak spoiled rich boy lacking in character and morals NOT to mention that although it was not greatly emphasized in the movie – he and his Duchess cavorted with the likes of Hitler and that certainly does not put him in any good light. And as an added piece of reality, I had the good fortune to attend the Sotheby’s auction of the estate of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor and from the look of his clothes he was not only a dandy, he was tiny one at that.


Who’s Going To Win an Academy Award?
Posted in From My Point of View - Personal commentary on Movies and Books, Uncategorized, tagged Academy Award, Academy Award for Best Picture, Best Supporting Actor, Christian Bale, Coen brothers, David Fincher, Hailee Steinfeld, King's Speech on February 26, 2011| 3 Comments »
"Hello Gorgeous"!
Everybody has jumped into the game! Predictions are coming in from far and wide, expected and unexpected. Who doesn’t have an opinion? Well of course I do…From My Point of View.
Who deserves it? Who is getting a popularity vote? How much is insider Hollywood politics playing a role? Is it a case of money talks and walks away with the Oscar? Is it just a crap shoot? Does anyone really believe that BEST is really the best? Tomorrow night we’ll all find out. Oscar parties abound, champagne and popcorn are my favorite combination to celebrate! Although in past years we have gone the whole movie candy route too, Junior Mints and all!!
Okay, OK, onto the predictions of this opinionated blogger.
BEST PICTURE: The King’s Speech – Hands down, this will win. It’s gotten the hype, the buzz and the right cast to win. Only real contenders were True Grit and Social Network. True Grit because the Coen brothers never make anything but excellent films and Social Network because the subject matter is so NOW and Jesse Eisenberg was fantastic.
BEST ACTOR: Colin Firth – Extraordinary embodiment of the character and as an actor he is extremely versatile and a great risk-taker. Flapping his gums and rolling around the floor, Colin proves once again, the depth and breadth of the excellent training Brittish actors receive.
BEST ACTRESS: Natalie Portman – Young as she is and up against veteran Annette Benning, I believe Natalie will take it. Very popular movie, the dieting, the work, the pregnancy and the engagement all add up to beating out Annette whose role was not a stretch for her by any means.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR: Christian Bale – This is the only movie of the 10 that I didn’t see but I have read enough about the movie and the role and know Geoffrey Rush is keen competition but I don’t think the Academy is going to have The King’s Speech walk away with every award and also Christian apparently was superb in this difficult role.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS: Melissa Leo – This IS a really tough call because there’s been so much buzz around Hailee Steinfeld and the Academy loves to honor up and coming actors in this category. Conventional wisdom says Melissa will win but I wouldn’t be surprised if Hailee is called up front and center.
BEST DIRECTOR: David Fincher – Going out on a limb here because it isn’t often that the Oscar for Best Director goes to other than the Director of Best Picture. However, Finch is overdue and is more like recent winners in this category. Not quite a toss-up but we’ll see.
Those are my top picks; I think Best Editing will go the Social Network , I think Costume Design will go to Jennie Beaven although I think Collen Atwood SHOULD win for Alice in Wonderland. Best Adapted Screenplay-Social Network. Best Original Screenplay-The King’s Speech.
Rate this:
Read Full Post »