Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Smooth or Crunchy’ Category

 

Marina Oswald Porter in Minsk born Marina Alex...

Image via Wikipedia

 

Week 17 – Delving into the COUP D’ETAT conspiracy is like peeling an onion, layer by layer.  The web of omissions, contradictions, deceptions, misconceptions and LIES unravels this theory week by week.

Marina Oswald

After Oswald’s arrest, his Russian-born wife, Marina, was quoted as saying, “Lee good man.  Lee not shoot anyone.”  For the next few months she was held in “protective custody” at the Inn of the Six Flags motel and questioned by agents of the Secret Service, the FBI, and the Great South West Corporation (owners of the motel, two of whose employees later became her legal representatives).  Despite the fact that Marina “lied repeatedly” to her captors, her testimony that Oswald owned and practiced with a rifle., and had previously tried to kill General Edwin Walker, was used to buttress the case against him.

Reinforcing her testimony was that of Mrs. Ruth Paine, with whom Marian had stayed for two months prior to the assassination in addition to confirming Marina’s story.  Paine cooperated with James Hosty, the agent who had charge of Oswald’s  FBI file.Hosty had interviewed Paine and Marina twice prior to November 22, and Paine later supplied him with evidence against Oswald.  While Paine and her temporarily estranged husband Michael were self-professed liberals, his family (with whom she lived for two months prior to harboring Marina) had intelligence connections: three close relatives were directors of the CIA-connected United Fruit Co. , his great-grandfather founded Bell Telephone, and he himself had a top security clearance at Bell Helico0per.  It was Ruth Paine who found Lee Oswald a job at the Texas School Book Depository.

Today, Marina states that threat of deportation were used to compel her testimony, that her husband was a federal agent who “adored” Kennedy, that someone impersonated Lee to incriminate him, and that he was killed to silence him.

Every Conspiracy is NOT a theory

Read Full Post »

As you who have been reading faithfully know, my daughter Chiara, (apple of my eye and direct fall from the tree) threw NOT ONE BUT TWO fabulous parties in ONE day and night.  She outdid herself and of course along the way exhausted herself.  The previous blogs talk about the extensive planning, listing, ordering, directing, setting up, picking up, and overall GC . In case you’re wondering what a GC is, that’s the person in charge of the whole development project.  She’s the one who imagines, plans, orders, directs and sub-contracts EVERYTHING.   I give you this prologue because amongst the party-giving, entertaining and cooking women I know, we all have the same complaint:  Our husbands are guests at their own parties!!

My husband, Peter is not only a guest at our parties, he’s practically a guest in our home as well.  Brought up as the first-born in dare I say a Jewish family although it is exactly the same for those first-born males in an Italian family (believe I know!), Peter sees every task in the household as someone else’s,  not sure who he thinks the someone else is….   Well apparently Tom, Chiara’s husband falls into the same category.  What happened on P-Day (Saturday) pretty much exemplifies what I’m saying;  Chiara is up with the baby early and trying to get out to get a last-minute manicure BEFORE more of the delivery people show up with ice, cakes, cupcakes, balloons and MORE… Tom, on the other hand says,”Can’t your Mom (that’s Gigi/me) watch Finley so I can go out for a run”?  I’m not going to retell the rest of what verbally transpired because I’m trying to keep my PG rating and it was tough enough to do so given the Latex,Leather and Lace blog!  Well you get the picture and I’m sure many of you have similar tales (and by the way, you can send them to me to be printed here)!!  This article appeared in the New York Times in 1996 – I cut it out then because, well you know why and since that was over 14 years ago, things haven’t really changed much.  Enjoy!

When a Husband Is a Guest At His Own Dinner Party

By LINDA MATHEWS
Published: April 3, 1996

I HAVE always admired those masterly men who know how to be the host of a dinner party. They stock the bar, fix the drinks, pass the hors d’oeuvres, advise their wives on the entree, perhaps even drift into the kitchen to casually assemble a trademark salad or to flambe a dessert.

My husband, Jay, isn’t anything like that.

He has come a long way since the night, early in our courtship, when he cooked dinner for me by spearing two frankfurters with a fork and singeing them over an open gas flame in his sublet kitchen. Now, he can make pancakes and birthday cakes and a few family specialties.

But when we have guests, Jay’s specialty is acting like a guest at his own party. He exclaims over the hors d’oeuvres, because he had nothing to do with their preparation and hasn’t seen them before. Ditto for the main course. He is usually so deep in conversation that I commandeer a male guest to open and pour the wine. Jay keeps his end of the table enthralled during dinner so that I feel guilty about interrupting him to ask for help in clearing the table and so do it myself. By the end of the party, after we have said good night to our guests, I’m exhausted and Jay is still sparkling.

“I had a great time,” he declares with genuine satisfaction. “Why don’t we give more parties?”

Even at moments like that, I am more amused than angry. He’s not really a shirker, I tell myself. This tendency to be a guest at his own parties is a minor flaw, like his inexplicable cravings for cherry Jello or his passion for “Star Trek” and other science fiction.

For a long time, I thought I had the only husband who was a guest at his own parties. Then a couple of years ago, an older couple invited us to a summer party on the patio, a farewell for a mutual friend to be transferred overseas. The nominal host sat on his hands for four hours, regaling guests with his own experiences abroad, most of them either instructive or amusing, while his wife kept the party going. She prepared the coals, scurried back and forth to the kitchen to freshen drinks, grilled the butterflied leg of lamb and fetched the ratatouille.

A telling moment came, I thought, as the salad course appeared and the host discovered there was something crucial missing.

“Dear, you forgot the dressing,” he called to his wife, who somewhat sullenly returned to the kitchen.

By dessert, she was steaming. The other women and I were taking turns helping her clear each course, and as I walked into the kitchen with a tray full of coffee cups, she was loading the dishwasher for the second time. And she was muttering curses I hadn’t heard since I worked in a print shop.

A month later, we heard that our host and hostess had separated, and that she was filing for divorce. I asked my husband, “Do you suppose being a guest at your own parties is grounds for divorce?”

“That’s not funny,” Jay said.

It’s not that serious for us, not yet anyway. Maybe that’s because we can sometimes afford to invite guests to restaurants, maybe because our daughter Kate loves parties and willingly lends a hand, maybe because, after almost 29 years of marriage, I have learned to accept Jay as he is, a nice guy who will never tend bar or assemble hors d’oeuvres.

I no longer consult him on party menus. His suggestions are — how shall I say this? — predictable. As I pore over cookbooks, looking for an alternative to the spinach soup and chicken marbella I have prepared at least a hundred times, he always says to me: “Why don’t we just have your lasagna? Everybody loves your lasagna.” I do make lasagna for the kids, but I haven’t fixed it for guests since graduate school, when we often invited 50 people to our one-bedroom apartment and never kept track of how many showed up.

And I don’t discuss dessert with him, either. “You can’t beat really good vanilla ice cream,” he says. “Doll it up with berries or sauce if you have to.” I maintain my Zen-like silence.

Of course, I don’t want him to feel left out entirely. So, at our last party, where as usual I cooked, set the table and cleared every course for 10 adults and four children, I made it clear that I wanted him to clean up.

Two guests, both old friends of mine, stayed and chatted with me as I propped my feet on a chair and leisurely ate a leftover dessert.Meanwhile, Jay stacked plates in the dishwasher, tackled a mountain of dirty pots and pans and emptied ashtrays. He washed the silver by hand. He spotcleaned the tablecloth with Spray ‘n’ Wash. By 1:30 A.M., when the last guests finally headed for the door, Jay looked uncharacteristically cranky.

“I had a great time!” I exclaimed. “Why don’t we give more parties?

Read Full Post »

This is the 15th installment of a conspiracy theory of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  If you believe Lee Harvey Oswald was the sold killer of our young president, JFK, read on and catch up from the beginning by searching the Conspiracy Theory Wednesday category.

“OSWALD” IN MEXICO

Oswald left New Orleans on September 26, 1963, and traveled by bus to Mexico City.  Passengers remembered the man who said he was going to Havana, was quite open about his leftist beliefs and conversed with an older man who spoke with an English accent.  The latter was identified by the FBI as Albert Osborne, alias John Bowen.  FBI records from 1942 described Osborne as a fervent Nazi supporter. A member of the fanatical anti-communist American Council of Christian Churches, he ran a missionary school for orphans in Puebla, Mexico, that allegedly served as a cover for training marksmen.

Oswald registered at a Mexico City hotel frequented by anti- Castro Cuban exiles, but his activities over the next few days are cloudy.  The CIA later reported that Oswald visited the Cuban and Soviet embassies seeking a Cuban visa.  CIA surveillance photos and tapes from bugs inside the embassies were sent to the FBI on the evening of November 22.  They were of someone else (still unidentified), and the CIA has never released any photos or tapes of the real Oswald at either embassy, though 12 pictures of the impostor were made public.   The purpose of Oswald’s trip to Mexico City may have been revealed by the CIA in a memo sent to the FBI ten days before he left.  It read: “[The CIA is] giving some consideration to countering the activities of [the Fair Play for Cuba Committee] in foreign countries…CIA is also giving some thought to planting deceptive information which might embarrass the Committee in areas where it does have some support.” The House Select Committee on Assassinations sealed for 50 years its 265-page report entitled “Lee Harvey Oswald”, the CIA, and Mexico City.

Read Full Post »

David Ferrie

Image via Wikipedia

Week 14 of the unraveling mysterious and complex conspiracy theory about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

DAVID FERRIE

The strongest denizen of 544 Camp Street ws former Eastern Airlines pilot, David Ferrie, who, as a contract employee of the CIA, flew dozens of clandestine missions to Cuba around the time of the 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion.  A bishop in an obscure sect called Orthodox Old Catholic Church of North America, and a master hypnotist, Ferrie suffered from a rare condition of hairlessness called Alopecia for which he compensated with grotesquely false eyebrows and toupee.  He worked closely with Banister’s anti-Castro operations, one time leading a CIA-staged “raid” (they had the key) on a bunker containing explosives allegedly given o the Schlumberger  Corporation byt he CIA for the ultra-right French Secret Army Organization (OAS) to use in a 1962 coup attempt against French President Charles De Gaulle.  The raid allegedly enabled the CIA to supply Cuban exile terrorists while Kennedy’s ban on such activities was in effect.

That Oswald and Ferrie knew each other is certain.  When Lee was 16 he joined the local Civil Air Patrol unit led by Captain Ferrie (who was discharged from Eastern because of  his homosexual liasions with teen-age boys).  In September 1963, they were seen together at a federally supported black voter registration drive in Clinton, LA.  The evening of Kennedy’s death, Ferrie drove through a thunderstorm to Houston, where he spent hours at a skating rink making and receiving phone calls.  According to a friend, he was to have picked up tow members of a hit team who never showed up.  The FBI questioned Ferrie  a few days later, but the interview was first classified by J. Edgar Hoover and later disappeared.


Just remember, a conspiracy is not always a theory!


Read Full Post »

Seal of the Central Intelligence Agency of the...

Image via Wikipedia

For thirteen (13) weeks we have been unraveling a well-known and much ascribed-to conspiracy theory of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  As I have said before there isn’t a baby boomer alive who doesn’t know where they were or what they were doing when the horrific news that our young President had been shot and killed.   This time in history was the Generation X’s Challenger explosion and Generation Y’s 9/11 WTC.  I mention this because if you are in the latter two categories and think that this theory doesn’t concern you and it’s ancient history anyway – THINK AGAIN!  This theory known as COUP D’ETAT, because in fact it was engineered by others in the government who sought power, is only an example, a lesson of what could and may have already occurred again.  The question is: Do You Believe Everything the Government Tells You?

CONTROL AGENT II – GUY BANNISTER

In April 1963, Oswald began a bewildering 5-month stay in the city of his youth, New Orleans.  There he started and was the only member of a chapter of the pro-Castro Fair Play for Cuba Committee (FPCC) and began passing  out leaflets at various locations.   On August 9 he was arrested after a street scuffle with anti-Castro activist Carlos Bringuier.  A week later, Oswald and Bringuier were joined in a radio debate by Ed Butler, director of the  CIA-backed information Council of the Americas.  Butler “exposed” Oswald’s Soviet defection, smeared the  FPCC as a Kremlin front, and made a “truth tape” of the debate for distribution in Latin America.  Was Oswald really pro-Castro, or was he an agent-provocateur?

One clue is the address stamped on the back of some of Oswald’s FPCC materials: 544 Camp Street.  Other tenants recall Oswald working in an office on the 2nd floor.  Not only was this the former HQ of the Cuban Revolutionary Council, a CIA-created government-in-exile with which Bringuier was involved, it was the address of Guy Banister Associates, a private detective agency fronting o the CIA’s anti-Castro activities in New Orleans.  Guy Banister former head of the FBI’s Chicago office, with ties to Naval Intelligence dating back to WWII, was a member of the John Birch Society and the paramilitary Minutemen, and published racist materials.  Although his files were confiscated shortly after his 1964 death, index cards were found revealing that the subjects of the files included Ammunition and Arms, the CIA, Anti-Soviet Underground, the Civil Rights Program of Kennedy, the International Trade Mart- and the Fair Play for Cuba Committee.


Read Full Post »

Week 12 and another installment of  the conspiracy theory about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  Many more to follow.  You can read this fascination chronology of a conspiracy theory by clicking on the category, Conspiracy Theory Wednesday.

GEORGE  DE MOHRENSCHILDT

On their arrival from the U.S.S.R., the Oswalds moved to Fort Worth, Texas, where on October 7, 1962, they were visited by a geologist named George Sergius De Mohrenschildt.  A Russian-born count whose father had been the Czarist governor of Minsk (Marina’s father had been a Czarist officer), De Mohrenschildt convinced the Oswalds to move to Dallas.  With his help, they were taken in by the Russian emigre community, many of whom were right wing “solidarists” who sided first with the Nazis and later with the CIA against the Communists.  On October 12th, the eve of the Cuban Missile Crisis, Oswald was hired by a graphic arts company that did classified work for the Army Map Service on top secret U2 overflights of Cuba.

Kenndey assassination, CiA, Lee Harvey Oswald, Schlumberger Coporation, Russian emigre

George De Mohrenschildt

For the next six months, Lee and George were close friends, an odd couple if there ever was one.  George’s social contacts included oil men like H.L. Hunt, Clint Murchison Sr., and Jean DeMenil, a fellow Russian emigre and head of the CIA-connected Schlumberger Corporation.  His good friend, J. Walter Moore, an agent in the CIA’s Domestic Contacts Division had “encouraged” George to befriend Oswald.  A world traveler, fluent in six languages, the count’s relationship with the CIA and its forerunner, the OSS, dated back to WWll, when, according to the FBI,. he worked for both the French underground and the Nazis.  His cousin, Baron Constantine Maydell, a producer of Nazi propaganda films, was a top Abwehr agent in the U. S.

De Mohrenschildt and Oswald parted company in April 1963.  Oswald left for New Orleans, and de Mohrenschildt went to Haiti, stopping en route in Washington D.C. to meet with a CIA agent and an assistant director for Army intelligence.

Read Full Post »

Week 11 and we are deep into exploring the conspiracy theory of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  If you are just joining this exploration and want to “catch up” – you can click on the category Conspiracy Theory Wednesday and read this unfolding saga.

CIA counter-intelligence chief, Lee Harvey Oswald, KGB,American Friends of the Anti-Bolshevik Nations, Soviet Domestic Intelligence, Marina Prusakova, Gary Powers, Spas T. Raikin, Traveler's Aid Society

James Jesus Angleton

JAMES JESUS ANGLETON

In addition to Oswald, seven U.S. military men defected to U.S.S.R. between June 1958 and January 1960.  At least four of them, including Oswald, soon returned to the U.S.  This, and Oswald’s Marine spy training, suggests they were part of a false defector   program run by U.S. intelligence.  Gary Powers, whose 1960 spy flight was shot down over Russia, later said Oswald supplied the Soviets with vital U2 radar data.  In any case, Oswald received a government stipend and a nice apartment in Minsk and married Marina Prusakova, whose uncle was a colonel in the Soviet Domestic Intelligence.  In June 1962, Oswald returned home with his bride.  They were met by Spas T. Raikin, a Traveler’s Aid Society agent who was also Secretary-General of the CIA-connected American Friends of the Anti-Bolshevik Nation.  The State Department, advised by the FBI,  said Oswald had not expatriated himself and could resume U.S. citizenship.   Because a State Department “look-out” card wasn’t issued, he was able to renew his passport on 24 notice.

In January 1964, KGB agent Yuri Nosenko defected to the U.S., claiming the KGB never debriefed Oswald about his military background nor recruited him.  James Jesus Angleton, the  CIA counter-intelligence chief who handled Agency matters pertaining to the Kennedy assassination, subjected Nosenko to 1277 days of hostile interrogation and solitary confinement, but Nosenko stuck by this story.  Angleton later said, “A mansion has many rooms; there were many things during the period; I’m not privy to who struck John.”  If Angeleton didn’t believe Oswald was the lone assassin who “struck John”, neither could he prove that Oswald was a Kremlin-sponsored killer.


Read Full Post »

So says AMC’s popular new series, RUBICON. And I’ve been hinting at that for weeks now.  Read further into COUP D’ETATThe Assassination of John F. Kennedy. This is the 10th installment entitled:

coup d'etat, "Shitbird", Oswaldkovitch,Marxist, Marguerite New Orleans, Queen Bee night spot, Army's Monterey school

Juat a Patsy? Lee Harvey Oswald

JUST A PATSY?   LEE HARVEY OSWALD

While in police custody, Lee Oswald was grilled repeatedly by federal and local officials, but, incredibly, no tapes or transcripts were made of his interrogation.  His questioners said that although Oswald admitted to being a Marxist, a former Soviet defector, and a supporter of Fidel Castro, he steadfastly denied shooting anyone.  There has never been any hard evidence against Oswald, who claimed he was “just a patsy”, but over the years he has emerged as a mystery man who inhabited a secret world of spies and conspirators.

Born and raised by his mother Marguerite in New Orleans, Oswald enlisted in the Marines in 1956.   Known as “Shitbird” because of his poor marksmanship.  Oswald had another Marine nickname, Oswaldkovitch, in reference to his open espousal of communism.  Yet the 17 year-old was given radar training and a security clearance and sent to Atsugi Air Base in Japan, the CIA’s main operational base in the Far East, and home to the top-secret U2 spy missions over Russia.  Oswald often visited Tokyo, where he carried on with a Japanese hostess who worked at one of the city’s most expensive night spots, the Queen Bee.  His military record, which shows that he contracted venereal disease “in the line of duty”, suggests these trysts might have been an intelligence assignment.  After his return from Japan on November 19, 1958, Oswald took a crash course in Russian at the Army’s Monterey School (now the Defense Language Institute).  On September 11, 1959, Oswald obtained an early discharge.  A month later, he defected to the Soviet Union.

Read Full Post »

Sorry we are a day late with this post but if you read any earlier ones, you know I was without internet access for two days and in the space/time compendium of Inception,  it seemed like a week!!!!

THE ZAPRUDER FILM

One of the Warren Commission’s “proofs” of a rearward attack was a film of the assassination taken by amateur photographer Abraham Zapruder and immediately bought by Life magazine publisher C. D. Jackson.  the film was suppressed, but selected frames were given to the Warren Commission and printed in Life in 1964.  In March 1975, when the Zapruder film was first shown on national television, it became clear that the previously printed frames had been flip-flopped, and in actuality  Kennedy was thrown violently backward, his head exploding in a frontal attack undid  the work of the Warren Commission.

In 1975-1976 several witnesses testifying to the Senate Intelligence Committee about the Kennedy murder died, prompting the 1976 creation of the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA).  An accoustical study of a police radio recording of the president’s assassination led the HSCA to conclude in 1979 that there had been a least four shots, and that a second gunman had fired from the grassy knoll.

HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey postulatied the Mafia was behind the conspiracy and developed circumstantial evidence that elements of organized crime played a role, concentrating on Jack Ruby’s ties to gangsters.  He underplayed Oswald’s voluminous CIA 201 file., demanded that all HSCA staff members and their private researchers sign secrecy oaths, allowed the CIA and FBI to conduct security checks on them, and defended his actions by asking, “I’ve worked with the CIA for twenty years., Would they lie to me?”

Assassination of John F.Kennedy, JFK killed, Dallsa Texas, Dealey Plaza, Governor John Connally, Jackie Kennedy, the pink suit,  Lee Harvey Oswald, President Kennedy

President John F. Kennedy is shot in the head

The following is an excerpt from Wikipedia regarding The Zapruder Film.

The Zapruder film is a silent, color motion picture sequence shot by private citizen Abraham Zapruder with a home-movie camera as U.S. President John F. Kennedy‘s motorcade passed through Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963, thereby unexpectedly capturing the President’s assassination.

Though not the only film of the shooting, it has been called the most complete, giving a relatively clear view from a somewhat elevated position, and on the side from which the president’s head wound is visible. It was an important part of the Warren Commission hearings and all subsequent investigations of the assassination, and is one of the most studied pieces of film in history. Of greatest notoriety is the film’s depiction of a fatal shot to President Kennedy’s head when his limousine was almost exactly in front of and slightly below Zapruder’s position.

Holding a Model 414 PD Bell & Howell Zoomatic Director Series Camera powered by a spring-wound mechanism, Zapruder stood atop of the most western of the two concrete pedestals that extend from the John Neely Bryanpergola[clarification needed] overlooking Elm Street in Dealey Plaza. He filmed from the time the presidential limousine turned onto Elm Street about 12:30 pm Central Time, until it passed out of view under a railway overpass, though with one apparent brief interruption (see below). The sequence contains 486 frames, or 26.6 seconds of Kodachrome II 8 mm safety film,[1] north of which 343 of the frames (18.7 seconds) show the president’s limousine.

By evening the film had been developed and three copies made. Zapruder immediately gave two of the copies to the Secret Service. On the morning of November 23, Zapruder sold the print rights to Life magazine, after which the original and the remaining copy were dispatched to Life’s production facilities in Chicago.

In March 1975, on the ABC late-night television show Good Night AmericaGeraldo Rivera), assassination researchers Robert Groden and Dick Gregory presented the first-ever network television showing of the Zapruder home movie. The public’s response and outrage to that first showing quickly led to the forming of the Hart-Schweiker investigation, contributed to the Church Committee Investigation on Intelligence Activities by the United States, and resulted in the House Select Committee on Assassinations investigation.

Have I got your attention yet????

Read Full Post »

If you Twitter and follow the Trending Worldwide list you know that Inception has been on the list for more than a week!!! That in itself is pretty unusual, almost unheard of in this day of today you’re hot and tomorrow you’re yesterday’s news – however the unknown number of Tweets devoted to this science fiction fantasy designed to mind-fuck the viewer, has to be in  the thousands. That kind of statistic should be enough to blow your mind never mind having to watch a movie that you’re never sure you’re watching anyway.

Inception, Christopher Nolan, dream within a dream, Leonardo DiCaprio

The Dream is REAL

Maybe I didn’t see it after all – it could have been a manufactured dream by Christopher Nolan or was I just a projectionist in Leo’s mind.  Well if I didn’t see it, I hope I wake up soon-hey that was one of the best lines in the movie! “Wake me up, wake me up”!

A gazillion dollar mega-movie designed to capture the insipid and the imaginative summer movie goer’s mind.  Well the timing couldn’t have been better.  I ‘ll bet there were more people going to see this movie in the Northeast than anyplace else.  Perfect formula: heat and humidity hovering in the 90’s for weeks, summer mind set as you wait for a two week vacation or regret that it’s already come and gone, supply several movie houses all icily air-conditioned and playing Inception and whammo, you’ve got a full house every day.

Let me share with you what some of the professional reviewers are saying:

Inception,” is an astonishment, an engineering feat, and, finally, a folly. Nolan has devoted his extraordinary talents not to some weighty, epic theme or terrific comic idea but to a science-fiction thriller that exploits dreams as a vehicle for doubling and redoubling action sequences. He has been contemplating the movie for ten years, and as movie technology changed he must have realized that he could do more and more complex things. He wound up overcooking the idea. Nolan gives us dreams within dreams (people dream that they’re dreaming); he also stages action within different levels of dreaming—deep, deeper, and deepest, with matching physical movements played out at each level—all of it cut together with trombone-heavy music by Hans Zimmer, which pounds us into near-deafness, if not quite submission. Now and then, you may discover that the effort to keep up with the multilevel tumult kills your pleasure in the movie. “Inception” is a stunning-looking film that gets lost in fabulous intricacies, a movie devoted to its own workings and to little else. Read more http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/cinema/2010/07/26/100726crci_cinema_denby#ixzz0v5DYs7Fz


It is a fascinating visual feast, The Matrix with heart and soul, a roller coaster ride into layers of the subconscious mind that challenges our ability to keep up.

Lori Hoffman

Are they handing out joints at the box office for this?

Kurt Loder
By convoluting the various planes of experience, by overlapping and obscuring ostensible realities and ostensible dreams, Mr. Nolan deprives us the opportunity of investing emotionally in any of it.

John Anderson
So there you have just a minute cross-sampling of what some of the best known critics are saying about this movie.
IF you saw it and loved and want to be amongst the like-minded, I say go to Twitter and add your Tweet to the multitude of adoring fans taking advantage of a public but not discriminating forum,  where you too can add your two cents to to the swarming ant hill of comments – because in Twitter, your comments (and mine) are just as important as Christopher Nolan’s and Roger Ebert’s – well at least for a millisecond before “44 New Tweets have been added since your comment.”

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »